Last week, I caught this great live debate on veganism. The online viewership was so large that buffering issues were a problem. The good news is, it was recorded!
What I really liked about this debate was its formality, in that it followed standard rules of discourse and didn’t devolve into a shouting match. It also seemed each side had plenty of time to make their points and counterpoints.
The audience was polled before and after the discussion to determine whether they were for or against the motion “Don’t Eat Anything With A Face.” The pre-debate results were 24% for, 51% against, and 25% undecided. (See below for the after.)
Don’t Eat Anything With A Face (Intelligence Squared U.S. Debates)
Panelists Arguing For The Motion:
- Dr. Neal Barnard – Clinical Researcher, Author, President and Founder of the Physician’s Committee for Responsible Medicine
- Gene Baur – President and Co-Founder of Farm Sanctuary
Panelists Arguing Against The Motion:
- Chris Masterjohn – Nutritional Sciences Researcher and Blogger at The Daily Lipid (where he has since started a series of posts reflecting on the debate)
- Joel Salatin – Farmer & Author
Post-debate Poll Results: 45% for, 43% against, and 12% undecided. Bravo! A pretty impressive change of heart.
For more information, including links to research papers, detailed biographies, and audio downloads, click the link under the video.
I also wanted to point out there is analysis by Animal Visuals debunking the claim of the panelists on the Against side that fewer animals would be killed by humans consuming grass-fed cattle than a vegan diet supplied via mechanized crop harvesting.